Home

Advertisement

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Sketch Group
Here is my mandatory end of year report. I tried not to write it at all, but I got re-asked this morning.

*******************

Based on my two years experience teaching here, there are a number of
suggestions I have for the improvement of English education and team
teaching. Unfortunately, many of these suggestions are constrained by
the dependence of the Japanese education system on poorly designed,
poorly thought out and poorly implemented testing. English in this
country is taught and evaluated with the same basic techniques as math
or science. Countless studies throughout the world have shown that
this is a poor method at best, and may actively hinder learning in
languages and critical thinking.

I also realize that no one really cares about my recommendations, and
that this letter is largely perfunctory because "everyone" knows that
year end reports should be written. If Japan was interested in
improving English education, then they would have started taking the
advice of ALTs and JTEs decades ago. Truthfully, I resent having to
write this at all, and think it is a waste of time for me and for the
few people out there who may actually read what I have to say.
That being said, hope springs eternal, and I do have some suggestions.

The first and most important is the removal of the separation between
speaking and grammar. English is not a dead language like Latin.
Nowhere else in the world is language taught with this kind of
segregation, and Japan lags almost last in the first world in English
comprehension. These two facts are not isolated. The lack of English
comprehension does not reflect on either the students or the teachers,
but rather on the system in which education is performed.
Memorization is not an effective way to teach a language. Stop
teaching English as a series of "sound bites" or phrases that need to
be memorized with little or no understanding of how they are used
contextually. Despite the similar use of the word "on", the following
phrases should not be taught together:
On Time
On Board
On The Table
I have personally seen this kind of grouping for memorization, and it
is pointless and frustrating for students.
Second, the text books for English are the worst texts I have ever
seen in my life as a teacher and a student of language. Instead of
starting simply and building in complexity, they merely give new
examples of word usage for memorization. I have seen almost no
complexity difference between the 1st year Junior High School book and
the 3rd year Senior High School text.

Third, English classes should be taught in English. I can't believe
how obvious this one is, and yet 99% of all English grammar classes
are taught almost exclusively in Japanese. If teachers aren't
comfortable teaching in English, they should be replaced by either
native speakers, or JTEs with a higher level of ability.

Fourthly, creative use of English should be stressed. Students should
be required at minimum to write as much as possible in English, and
speaking drills should not be memorized, but rather interactive.

In regards to my school in particular, there are a number of
suggestions that I feel would improve English learning. The first is
that ALTs at my school are incredibly under-used. I, and my
predecessor before me, taught less than 6 hours a week. My strongest
recommendation is that each class be cut in half, to double the number
of classes taught by the ALT and to improve one on one interaction by
shrinking the class size. It is impossible to teach spoken English
effectively in a class of 40 or more students.

In terms of the tests, exams should be graded on a positive scale
instead of a negative one. In other words, a student should start
with 0 points and gain points rather than starting at full points and
losing points for trivial grammar or spelling mistakes. The current
system encourages mediocrity, as students who play it safe and write
the minimum are much more likely to get high marks.

Finally, if the school were truly serious about teaching English, the
ALT would be used for 2nd and 3rd year students in addition to
freshman. It is incredibly sad that the average high school student
is best at English their first day at school, and that their ability
to speak and listen decreases throughout their three years in high
school.

Those are my suggestions for improvement. To tell you the truth, I
wish you would stop asking ALTs to write these sorts of reports,
because they just bring home to us how under-valued and basically
useless we really are. I have never in my life before felt more
helpless to enact change or to effectively do my job, which is
teaching incredibly intelligent and motivated students how to speak
and understand English. Clearly, the Japanese government does not
really want it's citizens to speak English, as they fear any change
that might reduce the country's "Japanese-ness".

Comments

( 11 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]lnherron wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2008 12:15 pm (UTC)
Say on, brother! I totally agree, but with "Korea" substituted for "Japan." Korea's making a few superficial changes, but the major underlying problems remain, which means this country will most likely remain where it is: the highest number of TOEFL takers in the world, but among the lowest scores; firmly average among the OECD nations in terms of test scores, with below-average numbers in the top and bottom tiers.

Ach, but they didn't ask us. Well, in your case, I guess they did, but as for whether or not they're actually listening.... -.-;;
[info]bjeorn wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2008 12:56 pm (UTC)
...any school
Hell, lets be honest, American schools don't do this with their foreign languages either.

I've always attributed it here to the LCD....perhaps its a school system thing.

Most of the suggestions you have here would definitely help in America as well as Japan....only there are really no ALTs here; just under valued teachers.
[info]eldritch48 wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2008 01:23 pm (UTC)
Re: ...any school
But American schools don't require *SIX YEARS* of the same language, with additional time usually spent in elementary school as well. Foreign language is much more "catch as catch can" in US schools...which is another problem ;)
[info]bjeorn wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2008 01:47 pm (UTC)
Re: ...any school
well, I can't comment on all schools in the US, but in the Charlotte Meck. and Ashe County system they do now require four years in High School. And they theoretically give some time to it in elementary and middle school (I had some basic spanish stuff as early as 4th grade).

With the "new" focus that they had when I left, it wasn't uncommon for people to have 6 years of it; grades 7 --> 12 (although only 9-->12 was required)....and that doesn't count the few classes a month that they give in grades 4 --> 6.

....obviously I was only really in two school systems, but they were both like this.
[info]eldritch48 wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2008 01:52 pm (UTC)
Re: ...any school
But you didn't have to take the same language, and, frankly, having been both places...if you got consistently an 'A' in your language classes for 4-6 years back home, you'd speak fairly well....here...not so much.
[info]doji_shiori wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2008 09:21 pm (UTC)
Re: ...any school
CMS has a program now (about 10 years old I think) called language immersion. It's a magnet program so it's opt in only. You must start the program in kindergarten or 1st grade at the latest. The children are taught by native or completely fluent speakers (german, french, spanish, chinese, & japanese). In k & 1st they are spoken to 85% of the time in the target language. It slowly decreases to 50% as they go on. The kids end up fluent in both and able to read and write in both. It's truly amazing. Our youngest will be in the program next year for spanish.
[info]goawayplease wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2008 02:02 pm (UTC)
Re: ...any school
After three years of French in high school [45 minutes/4 times a week], I could speak and write decently. Twelve years later I can still pull it out when I'm vacationing, watching movies or reading an article online. I don't think Seth's students could say the same. French is much closer to English than Japanese, but if I'd done six years of it and had a separate class to focus on grammar, I'd be dead fluent. I wasn't an enthusiastic student when I was a kid, but our classwork was immersive and taught in the other language from day one and our textbooks had a lot of easy reading material with minimal memorization outside of verbs and vocabulary. We had to write a paragraph or two each week and they were usually on pretty broad topics, like "where would you like to go on vacation" or "what does your classmate look like". I actually have a hard time translating because we were taught to turn off that part of our brains and just listen to the other language on its own.

Seth -- how did you survive that? I know you like your kids and like teaching, but that must have been very frustrating...
[info]eldritch48 wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2008 02:14 pm (UTC)
Re: ...any school
Yes, it's been a bit frustrating...do you remember last year when I was so angry all the time? That was me coming to terms with my job mostly. This last year, I've kinda known what the situation was, and done what I could given that. It's only when they ask for advice that I get a little bit burned ;)

And like I said, I love my kids, and they try so hard, and overcome so much that it's hard not to grow attached to them, and that made it worth it for me.

People see all the cool and innovative stuff out of Japan, and they don't realize that it's a case of Darwinism in action. To finish school with any creativity or ability intact, you have to be bloody *amazing*. 99.99% of the graduates are basically drones.

I did what I could to fight that. In a couple of cases, I think I did a good job of that. Ultimately, that's what I can claim credit for given the situation, and I'm quite proud of that :)
[info]genkisakka wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2008 02:51 pm (UTC)
Good for you for laying it all out. Many of my adult students in Tokyo had the same complaints about their English instruction -- too much random memorization, not enough speaking practice.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2008 12:19 pm (UTC)
"Nowhere else in the world is language taught with this kind of segregation"

How many countries have you taught and studied languages in? In every country I have worked in (Spain, Turkey, Thailand, Greece etc) the schools teach languages that way- hence the need for private language schools- and my own French lessons were very similar.

TEFLtastic blog- www.tefl.net/alexcase
[info]eldritch48 wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2008 01:14 pm (UTC)
I understand that some level of differentiation between grammar and speaking is probably necessary, but Japan is *famous* for treating them like 2 different languages.
( 11 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

July 2008
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow